Today I had the privilege of meeting with five Justices of The Supreme People’s Court.
The Justices were very engaging and did a great job educating our group on procedural issues. We discussed everything
No Comments • Read this post »
This morning I met with a delegation of the State Intellectual Property Office led by Deputy Commissioner Yang Tiejun in Beijing. He participated in a question and answer session covering various topics.
No Comments • Read this post »
From Oct. 29 – Nov.5 Harness Dickey attorney Robert (Bob) Siminski will a delegate of
No Comments • Read this post »
In CyberSource v. Retail Decisions, Inc., No. 2009-1358 (August 16, 2011), the Federal Circuit held that an Internet-related method claim and a “computer readable medium” claim both fail to recite
No Comments • Read this post »
In CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. Return Path, Inc., No. 2010-1202, -1203 (Fed. Cir. August 10, 2011), CBT appealed a district court’s judgment that a claim was invalid as indefinite. The claim was for
No Comments • Read this post »
The panel decision in AMP v. Myriad Genetics, written by Judge Lourie, contained law and fact rulings consistent with the Amicus Brief submitted by HDP on behalf of Gilead Sciences, Inc., Biogenerator
No Comments • Read this post »