Section » Featured

Bilski’s Claims Unpatentable Abstract Ideas; Machine-or-Transformation a Useful, Not Exclusive Test for Patentable Subject Matter

Bilski’s Claims Unpatentable Abstract Ideas; Machine-or-Transformation a Useful, Not Exclusive Test for Patentable Subject Matter

By Anna M. Budde • on June 30, 2010

Bilski v. Kappos, No. 08-964 (S. Ct. June 28, 2010). On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited (oral arguments were November 9, 2009) decision in Bilski v. Kappos. The Court affirmed the rejection of Mr. Bilski’s claims, which were directed to methods of hedging against a risk of price changes for a commodity, as an unpatentable

No CommentsRead this story »

More Articles

Another Case (Surprisingly) of First Impression for the Federal Circuit

Another Case (Surprisingly) of First Impression for the Federal Circuit

By HDP • on June 21, 2010

Hot on the heels of January’s Boehringer Ingelheim Int’l GmbH v. Barr Labs., Inc., 592 F.3d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2010) decision on divisional practice, the Federal Circuit tackled another issue “of first impression,” how to make a valid priority claim through a chain of applications.  Most patent

No CommentsRead this story »

“First Sale” Doctrine Does Not Apply When There Is a Likelihood of Post-Purchase Confusion

“First Sale” Doctrine Does Not Apply When There Is a Likelihood of Post-Purchase Confusion

By HDP • on May 11, 2010

On appeal from the District of Arizona, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment to trademark-owner Volkswagen of America Inc. (“Volkswagen”), holding that the “first sale” doctrine does not provide a defense when likelihood of confusion has been established. The

No CommentsRead this story »

Meeting Ariad’s Written Description Requirement

Meeting Ariad’s Written Description Requirement

By HDP • on April 22, 2010

Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company, No. 2008-1248 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 22, 2010) (en banc) In a much anticipated decision, the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision addressing the scope

1 CommentRead this story »

Best Mode for Producing Lysine Included Undisclosed Features

Best Mode for Producing Lysine Included Undisclosed Features

By HDP • on March 9, 2010

In method for producing L-lysine including  genetically altering E. coli, inventors failed to disclose best host strain to use and  further modification that enhanced production. Ajinomoto Co. v. ITC, 2009-1081 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2010) In

No CommentsRead this story »

Patents Obvious Over Same Prior Art Raised During Ex Parte Reexamination

Patents Obvious Over Same Prior Art Raised During Ex Parte Reexamination

By HDP • on March 3, 2010

Dissent finds a bias against protecting an invention that “does not advance rocket science or cancer medicine.” A divided Federal Circuit panel affirmed summary judgment that claims in Media Tech’s two patents to trading cards with attached items or fragments of memorabilia were obvious over prior

No CommentsRead this story »

Failure to Properly Preserve and Search for ESI Results in Monetary Sanctions and Spoliation Jury Instructions

Failure to Properly Preserve and Search for ESI Results in Monetary Sanctions and Spoliation Jury Instructions

By HDP • on February 22, 2010

District Court Judge who issued Zubulake decision again orders sanctions for failure to properly handle electronically stored information (ESI) in discovery. Pension Committee of the Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan et al. v. Banc of America Securities, LLC, et al., — F.R.D. —–, 2010

No CommentsRead this story »

Beyond Mere Planning and Preparation: The Duty of Loyalty Owed By Employees to Their Employers

Beyond Mere Planning and Preparation: The Duty of Loyalty Owed By Employees to Their Employers

By HDP • on February 10, 2010

by Kara R. Yancey  Suppose you represent a company whose former employee has either started a competing company or now works for a competitor.  Unfortunately, the company did not

No CommentsRead this story »

Picture Is Not a Mandatory Requirement for a Website-Based Specimen of Use Submitted with Trademark Application

Picture Is Not a Mandatory Requirement for a Website-Based Specimen of Use Submitted with Trademark Application

By HDP • on January 4, 2010

Federal Circuit reverses Trademark Office’s holding that an internet specimen of use must include a picture of the goods to be registrable. In re Michael Sones, Docket No. 2009-1140 (Dec. 23, 2009) In re Sones is an appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (“TTAB”) rejection of Michael

No CommentsRead this story »

U.S. District Court For The Eastern District Of Texas Ordered To Transfer Venue

U.S. District Court For The Eastern District Of Texas Ordered To Transfer Venue

By HDP • on December 2, 2009

Federal Circuit again orders Eastern District of Texas to transfer venue of a patent case to a more convenient forum, this time the Eastern District of North Carolina. In re Hoffman-La Roche Inc., et al., Misc. Docket No. 911 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 2, 2009) After the Eastern District of Texas denied their motion

1 CommentRead this story »