Section » HD Signals

European Council Adopts Conclusions on Enforceable European Patent and Unified European Patent Litigation System

European Council Adopts Conclusions on Enforceable European Patent and Unified European Patent Litigation System

By • on December 7, 2009

The European Council, the decision-making body of the European Union [EU], adopted conclusions on its vision for unified European patents and patent courts as a “basis for continuing work.” The “European and EU Patents” court would have exclusive patent jurisdiction for European patents and EU patents, with local divisions taking infringement

No CommentsRead this story »

More Articles

Federal Circuit Holds that Implied Assertions of Patent Rights are Sufficient to Give Rise to Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction

Federal Circuit Holds that Implied Assertions of Patent Rights are Sufficient to Give Rise to Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction

By • on December 7, 2009

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Acceleron LLC, No. 2009-1283 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 4, 2009). Federal Circuit reversed district court and held that declaratory judgment jurisdiction was present.  Upon viewing the facts objectively and in their totality, the Court found that Acceleron made implied assertions of its

No CommentsRead this story »

Claims To Methods Of Managing Bulk E-Mail Distribution To Groups Of Targeted Consumers Obvious Based On “Common Sense”

Claims To Methods Of Managing Bulk E-Mail Distribution To Groups Of Targeted Consumers Obvious Based On “Common Sense”

By • on December 2, 2009

Federal Circuit affirms grant of summary judgment by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, agreeing that the asserted claims for an email distribution system were invalid as based on the application of “common sense.” Perfect Web Techs., Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc., No. 2009-1105

No CommentsRead this story »

Method for Enhancing Muscle Performance or Recovery Anticipated by Flex Magazine Advertisements

Method for Enhancing Muscle Performance or Recovery Anticipated by Flex Magazine Advertisements

By • on November 30, 2009

Iovate Health Sciences, Inc., v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc., No. 2009-1018 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2009) Federal Circuit affirmed grant of summary judgment by the Eastern District of Texas holding that the patent-in-suit was invalid as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) for being

No CommentsRead this story »

Federal Circuit Affirms that Mattress.com is Generic

Federal Circuit Affirms that Mattress.com is Generic

By • on November 6, 2009

In Re 1800Mattress.com IP, LLC, No. 2009-1188 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2009) Federal Circuit affirmed Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s opinion that MATTRESS.COM is generic for “online retail store services in the field of mattresses, beds, and bedding” and is thus not entitled to registration.   The

1 CommentRead this story »

Federal Circuit Proposes Rule Changes

Federal Circuit Proposes Rule Changes

By • on October 26, 2009

The Federal Circuit has proposed changes to some of its Rules, including: Rule 8. Stay or Injunction Pending Appeal Rule 12. Docketing the Appeal Rule 18. Stay Pending Review Rule 21. Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition, and Other Extraordinary Writs Rule 25. Filing and Service Rule 26. Computing and Extending

No CommentsRead this story »

USPTO Issues Notice of Change to Docketing of RCEs

USPTO Issues Notice of Change to Docketing of RCEs

By • on October 21, 2009

On October 19, 2009, United States Patent and Trademark Office released a “Notice of Change to Docketing of Requests for Continued Examination.”  According to this Notice, requests for continued examination (“RCEs”) filed on or after November 15, 2009 will be placed on the examiner’s “Special

No CommentsRead this story »

Federal Circuit Grants Petition for Rehearing en banc

Federal Circuit Grants Petition for Rehearing en banc

By • on October 15, 2009

On October 13, the Federal Circuit ordered rehearing en banc in Princo Corp. et al. v. ITC, vacating the Court’s April 20, 2009 opinion.  In its order granting rehearing, the Federal Circuit directed the parties to file new briefs “addressing primarily those issues originally decided

No CommentsRead this story »

Improper Revival of Patent Could Be Inequitable Conduct

Improper Revival of Patent Could Be Inequitable Conduct

By • on October 13, 2009

Improper revival of a patent that expired for non-payment of maintenance fees can be raised as inequitable conduct, but not as grounds for invalidity. In Abstrax,

No CommentsRead this story »