Section » Patent Prosecution

USPTO Issues Nearly A Quarter Million Patents in 2011

USPTO Issues Nearly A Quarter Million Patents in 2011

By • on January 11, 2012

The USPTO issued a total of 247741 patents in 2011, more than any previous year. Of these, 224519 were utility patents. It is interesting to note that of these utility patents, 1693 were also filed in 2011, indicating that at least a small fraction (0.75%) of patents issue very expeditiously. Half of the patents that issued in 2011 were filed in

No CommentsRead this story »

More Articles

USPTO Issues 21356 Design Patents in 2011

USPTO Issues 21356 Design Patents in 2011

By • on January 11, 2012

The USPTO issued 21256 design patents in 2011, which is down slightly from 2010 (22799) continuing the downward trend since 2008 when issuances peaked at 25,565. The vast majority of design patents issue without a year of filing, although in 2011, two design patents: D635989 and D637616, both filed

No CommentsRead this story »

Incorporation by reference does not expand claim scope

Incorporation by reference does not expand claim scope

By • on April 27, 2011

In those heady days of yesteryear, when the patent filing fee was $35 and prior art was printed on crumbling paper, patent attorneys relished the word “means.” They drank coffee from a “cup means,” wrote letters with a “pen means,” and played golf with “club means.” Somehow the word “means”

1 CommentRead this story »

Providing Support for Generous Construction of a Claimed Range

Providing Support for Generous Construction of a Claimed Range

By • on April 22, 2011

Lexion Medical, LLC v. Northgate Technologies, Inc., 2009-1494 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 22, 2011). Writing for the court, Chief Judge Rader handed patent prosecutors a checklist for getting the most out of a numerical range.  First, “[t]his court prefers a claim interpretation that harmonizes the various elements

No CommentsRead this story »

The Sin of Synonyms

The Sin of Synonyms

By • on April 7, 2011

As we wait for the Federal Circuit’s en banc pronouncement on inequitable conduct in Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson, the claim construction aspect of that case illustrates a greater difficulty in patent infringement cases than divining the fraudulent intent of applicants and their attorneys. 

1 CommentRead this story »

USPTO Announces Implementation of Track One

USPTO Announces Implementation of Track One

By • on April 6, 2011

The US Patent and Trademark Office announced yesterday that on May 4, 2011 it will implement Track One, prioritized examination, of the new three-track examination system.  There will be an added fee of $4000 for requesting Track One examination on top of the regular filing fees.  (As yet, there is

No CommentsRead this story »

IS THE END IN SIGHT FOR PATENT MISMARKING CLAIMS?

IS THE END IN SIGHT FOR PATENT MISMARKING CLAIMS?

By • on March 17, 2011

In In re BP Lubricants USA Inc., [Misc. 960](March 15, 2011) the Federal Circuit granted BP Lubricant’s  Petition for a writ of mandamus directing the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to dismiss a complaint for false patent marking under 35 USC §292  filed against BP.  

No CommentsRead this story »

Meeting Ariad’s Written Description Requirement

Meeting Ariad’s Written Description Requirement

By • on April 22, 2010

Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company, No. 2008-1248 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 22, 2010) (en banc) In a much anticipated decision, the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision addressing the scope

No CommentsRead this story »

Best Mode for Producing Lysine Included Undisclosed Features

Best Mode for Producing Lysine Included Undisclosed Features

By • on March 9, 2010

In method for producing L-lysine including  genetically altering E. coli, inventors failed to disclose best host strain to use and  further modification that enhanced production. Ajinomoto Co. v. ITC, 2009-1081 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2010) In

No CommentsRead this story »

New Trial for Inconsistent Verdict of Nonobvious Independent Claim, Obvious Dependent Claims

New Trial for Inconsistent Verdict of Nonobvious Independent Claim, Obvious Dependent Claims

By • on March 3, 2010

JMOL on validity reversed because judge misunderstood when art is analogous; claim constructions using dictionary and prosecution argument upheld. A JMOL on validity of the dependent claims to cure an inconsistent jury verdict for obviousness of  claims dependent on nonobvious  independent claims could

No CommentsRead this story »